Writing Advice
A Rush Job
Re-visioning
Getting it Right the Twentieth Time
Critique Groups
Traditional Publishing
Advanced Punctuation
|
PUNCTUATION
On-line Characterization, plotting, grammar,
punctuation—all of these are all important tools for writers. Since
a professional, error-free manuscript is essential in these competitive
times, I have mastered the commas, quotation marks and periods necessary
for dialogue, dependent clauses and most basic sentences. But having successfully
escaped from high school and college English classes, I felt free to use
fragments and other grammatical errors if it served character or voice.
But last fall a fellow writer asked whether anyone in our critique group
would be interested in doing exercises from The Art of Styling
Sentences: 20 Patterns for Success (third edition) by Marie
L. Waddell, Robert M. Esch, Roberta R Walker. It sounded interesting;
I volunteered.
Every week or two, my friend would define
a pattern and list several examples illustrating its use. It was an education.
I started seeing interesting punctuation everywhere: magazines, newspapers,
novels and newsletters. I learned how complex sentences can be helpful
in making contrasts and comparisons, similes and metaphors, lists and
echoes. Some new constructions were simple and straightforward; others,
complex. Imagine my surprise to find that some patterns of speech, which
I had always regarded as fragments, could be written as sentences with
complex punctuation guiding the reader smoothly through their intricacies.
Like a child with a new toy, I crowded a recent short
story for Cicada with interesting constructions that used to be outside
my repertoire. I’m wondering whether my friends will notice the
changes, whether they’ll find the more complex sentences a distraction,
whether my punctuation will confuse rather than guide the reader, whether
I should have stayed with a simpler, more direct style. Basic sentences
work perfectly in so many situations. After this experiment, I think I’ll
use these constructions more sparingly for spice and variety. But if a
story comes along demanding a rich, complex style—think of Robin
McKinley’s elegant prose--I’d like to be ready.
In general, I don’t try to shoehorn these constructions
into a piece; I’m not like a Baroque painter or composer intent
on adding a gaudy flourish. This essay, however, was an exception: I packed
in as many as possible. Was it noticeable? Was it annoying? Anyone care
to play count the semi-colons?
-
|